New from North Shore Billet: SRAM double spiders for standard chainrings

Really digging SRAM’s latest aluminum and carbon fiber double cranksets but bummed not to be able to run combinations lower than a 26/39 on their 120mm bolt circle diameter, the guys at North Shore Billet got to work.  The aptly-named NSB 2×10 Spider is the result.  Allowing the use of readily-available 104 BCD 9s inner and middle rings, the North Shore Billet spider maintains the 2×10 rings’ distance from the bike’s centerline (as opposed to a triple with the big ring removed, which would sit the two rings inboard. This helps keep that 2×10 shifting magic and reduce chain rub.  Hit the jump for more pictures, pricing, and links…

You can even run a bash guard!

Goes great with carbon...

The NSB 2×10 Spider is made in Canada, available for X9 and X0 cranks, and available now for $70.  Find them at your local shop or


mgr - 07/25/12 - 8:36am

You can buy sram spiders and chainrings so you can go down to 36-22 and 38-24

And you can buy the cranksets in that setup to. At least in europe you can :)

GrandesRoues - 07/25/12 - 9:16am

yep, i don’t see the point as sram offer already such a spider with 22/36 (but not with 180mm cranks :(

sram says that it’s chainline is 49,5, wich should be same as this ?

What i would buy from BSD is the same spider but with a greater chainline (more outside), to be inline with a 142+ or 150mm rear hub, and have great clearance for the front derailleur with a knobby tire and short chainstays.

Juano - 07/25/12 - 9:44am

Actually guys, Sram is making it harder and harder to get these spiders in hand so this is a great option.

David - 07/25/12 - 1:18pm

Does the spider work with GXP as well as BB30?

Chris - 07/25/12 - 1:29pm

SRAM does offer the 22/36T combo in 10sp rings with a 104 BCD – BUT if you want to run 34T or 32T ring SRAM does not make 10sp rings in these sizes. So if you mounted a standard 34T 9sp ring onto the SRAM spider your front shifting would be off because of the different spacing between 9 and 10sp.

Chris - 07/25/12 - 1:59pm

We currently have spider for GXP – BB30 spiders will be in stock in 2 weeks.

Jim - 07/25/12 - 8:50pm

I just ordered one. For me the possibility of running with a bash with the chainrings in the optimal location is the key.

Eddie - 07/25/12 - 8:56pm

Glad to see an option for adding a bashguard. Clearly SRAM doesn’t ride the East Coast much.

Ryan - 07/26/12 - 12:50am

Does this spider move the chainrings more inboard?

GrandesRoues - 07/26/12 - 3:46am

thanks for the explanations, Chris. So this does look interesting for my next build indeed.

If you want to expand your market, you could try to ressurect the 5 bolts pattern for sram cranks. This allows to mount 20-30-40 rings that are really good on a 29″er ! But then, with widespread cassettes, not so many people run triples anymore.

I still would be very interested in an increased chainline version of your double setup :
Front derailleur touching edge knobs is THE limiting factor for short chain stays 29″ers. (see latest pivot presentation for an example).
With an increased chainline, one could really tuck a big knobby tire with the derailleur on the side without interference.

DHS - 07/26/12 - 12:35pm

This is worthless, the oem 2010 cranks, 2011 and 2012 cranks are ALL different spiders. for the oem SRAM carbon cranks and the x.9 or OX spiders. the spacing is completely different.

yes, you can find all the combos of chainrings from sram, 36/22(104bcd), 38/24(104bcd), 39/26(120bcd), 42/28(120bcd)

Ralph - 07/26/12 - 1:19pm

Why not just get rid of the front derrailleur? The 36T cog on the cassette is more than enough.

chris - 07/27/12 - 10:57am

Good idea, NSB. It’s nice to see small companies finding ways around the big guys’ attempts at standardization. It gives riders options if they want them, and being able to run a 22t/32t combo with a bit more chainline spacing (to accommodate bigger tires) is a niche that needs to be filled. Even if it is only for North Shore/Whistler type riding. Keep up the innovating.

Primoz - 07/27/12 - 1:35pm

Ralph take a trip to some steep areas. Like the Alps. I’d like to see you pulling a 32-36 up those climbs. And a 32 up front isn’t exactly ideal, 36 would be best.

eggs - 08/08/12 - 2:27pm


google”bling ring” you can run a 28-36
thats plenty low

Post a comment:

Comment sections can be a beautiful source of knowledge, conversation and comedy. They can also get pretty ugly, which is why we've updated our Comments Policy. If your comment isn't showing up or suddenly disappears, you might want to check it out.