Bikerumor Pic Of The Day: Beauty Stop
Photo submitted by Adam Finn Tate in Dupont, WA.
To see more Pics of the Day, click here, and to submit your own photo to be shown to the world, go here.
Catch up on all of our Project 1.2 posts here! With out Project 1.2 singlespeed, we set out…
The only way to make aerodynamics not matter is to stop moving. That line basically sums up Specialized’s…
When Mavic rolled out the CXR80 last year, they introduced an entirely new take on aerodynamic wheels with…
Mavic’s Annecy, France, HQ houses clothing & footwear design and wheels prototyping and testing. It also holds their…
With the introduction of Bontrager’s new All Weather (AW) line of tires, even they admit that previously…
Sea Otter is full of mini product launches within its Laguna Seca confines, but it is also host…
Photo submitted by Adam Finn Tate in Dupont, WA.
Comments
Are there no limits on the number of spacers that can placed under the stems? I see so many bicycles out there with large stacks of spacers. Every carbon fork that I have assembled has a recommend height of spacers. Let alone the fit questions this brings up.
The only question is why people get their knickers all twisted about how other folks run their stems and the number of spacers they use. Was this case when people used quill stems? I don’t remember it as such. Given that with few exceptions, most manufacturers provide a smaller–sometimes much so–number of frames, it should be pretty obvious that there will be folks who require more spacers than others. So long as the number of spacer don’t exceed what the fork manufacturer recommends, who cares? One things for certain, unless you own the fork in question or have intimate knowledge of it, you have no idea what the max amount of spacers is. It’s no wonder roadies are considered snobs.
Seat appears to be all of the way back on the rails. Seat to handlebar height looks right, but both to tall though. My guess frame is too small for rider. Built to make it “fit”.