Home > Bike Types > Mountain Bike

SOC16: FSA adds modular cranks (Boost, no Boost, no problem) plus dropper & more

10 Comments
Support us! Bikerumor may earn a small commission from affiliate links in this article. Learn More

2017-FSA-modular-boost-mountain-bike-cranksets03

With seemingly ever changing standards, it’s nice to see something that’s virtually future proof come along. The new FSA modular mountain bike cranks are just that, using a simple spacer system to adjust chainline to work with Boost and non-Boost bikes equally well. And thanks to their interchangeable spindle, spider and chainring system, they should work with any other standard that may come along, too.

But what about bottom brackets? They have that covered, too, along with new lightweight and low-rise stems, a dropper post and more…

2017-FSA-modular-boost-mountain-bike-cranksets02

The modular system will cover the span, from top of the line SL-K carbon ($419.99 w/ 1x chainring) to the affordable alloy Comet ($179.99). The image at top of post shows the silver spacer ring. Put it between the chainring/spider and crank arm for standard bikes, and behind the chainring for Boost.

2017-FSA-modular-boost-mountain-bike-cranksets01

Their spiders and direct-mount chainrings use a lock ring on the back to hold them in place, the tool above provides the interface.

2017-FSA-modular-boost-mountain-bike-cranksets06

Replace the spindle to make it fit different BB widths…

2017-FSA-BB392EVO-bottom-bracket-options01

…and different BB’s to fit virtually any frame out there, all using their 30mm spindle.

2017-FSA-modular-boost-mountain-bike-cranksets05

2017-FSA-BB392EVO-bottom-bracket-options02

The four options for modular cranks and their specs, click to enlarge.

2017-FSA-K-Force-Light-carbon-mtb-crank-arms01

Eschewing modularity for lightweight, the K-Force Light uses an asymmetric 4-arm spider built into the carbon crank arm with bonded alloy spindle attached to the driveside. It is, in their words, the lightest mountain bike crankset available. At just 425g (claimed) with a single chainring, they might be right. Put a double chainset on it and it’s still only 495g. The arms are hollow UD carbon, available in 170mm and 175mm lengths.

2017-FSA-K-Force-Light-carbon-mtb-crank-arms03

FSA’s 1x single chainrings use their deeper “Megatooth” narrow wide design to enhance chain retention.

2017-FSA-K-Force-and-SL-K-carbon-mtb-stems01

Joining the lightweight cranks is the new 143g K-Force Light carbon-wrapped alloy stem with a -12º rise. Designed to get the front end low on 29ers, it’s their stiffest mountain bike stem, but not the lightest.

2017-FSA-K-Force-and-SL-K-carbon-mtb-stems05

That honor could have gone to the 133g SL-K version, which uses a square-ish alloy body with carbon faceplate, but instead goes to the round alloy Afterburner stem. That one, on right, comes in at a claimed 128g. All three get the same negative rise and come in 10mm length increments from 60mm to 140mm.

2017-FSA-gravity-grid-stem-riser-handlebar01

The new FSA Gravity GRID riser bar and stem add a 35mm diameter clamp option to their DH/enduro lineup.

2017-FSA-gravity-grid-stem-riser-handlebar04

2017-FSA-gravity-dropper-seatpost02

To go with it is the new Gravity dropper seatpost. We got a sneak peek of this earlier in the year with the tech details, and now it’s almost available.

2017-FSA-gravity-dropper-seatpost03

Two versions will be offered, this Gravity version with a beefed up saddle clamp area, and a slightly lighter FSA version with a slimmer clamp for less aggressive riding. They’ll both come in 100mm and 125mm travel with 30.9 and 31.6 diameters. Claimed weight for the Gravity version is 738g.

2017-FSA-gravity-dropper-seatpost05

The remote can be placed up or down, left or right. Claimed availability is April 2016, and as of this post there’s a spot for it on FSA’s homepage (without images), but Gravity’s site isn’t showing it yet. With a retail of just $299 and easy rebuildability, it might be worth waiting for.

FullSpeedAhead.com and RideGravity.com

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Veganpotter
Veganpotter
7 years ago

I’m I little perplexed about a dropper that’s 300g heavier than most. Sure, its cheaper but that’s a ton of extra weight.

missedthepoint
missedthepoint
7 years ago

Nice to see that they get that crankset weight with a chainring that doesn’t appear to be flimsy like some of the other anorexic chainring designs out there.

Mike.
Mike.
7 years ago
Reply to  missedthepoint

It’s the same interface. FSA makes them for cannondale. Also the same as Raceface.

Mike
Mike
7 years ago

For the cranks, is that the Cannondale Hollowgram chainring interface design?

Heffe
Heffe
7 years ago

Is the chainring interface unique to FSA or could you mount, say, a SRAM chainring on there?

traildog
traildog
7 years ago

Anyone else tired of narrow-wide rings wearing out and making noise? With the superlight chainguides available I think i’m going back to shimano’s tall symmetrical teeth.

Ob1Hoagie
Ob1Hoagie
7 years ago

Can those racer boy stems be flipped to run at a POSITIVE 12 degrees ? Some of us aren’t in our 20’s and 30’s and actually like a more upright riding stance. 😉

Jeb
Jeb
7 years ago

Narrow wide rings last a really long time if you keep your drive train cleani(ish) and lube regularly.

greg
greg
7 years ago

Why they didn’t make this system 95mm (and their road cranks 90mm) is beyond me. Practically every other wide-30mm crank manufacturer went with 90/95. FSA kept theirs ever-so-slightly narrower, ruining cross compatibility…

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.

Subscribe Now

Sign up to receive BikeRumor content direct to your inbox.