r2bike Builds a 15.2 Pound OpenCycle 1.0, with Pedals!


r2bike Open cycle 1 0 15 pound 29 mountain bike (1)

In a world where 10.2 lb production road bikes are a thing, super lightweight mountain bikes aren’t far behind. Just what does a mountain bike have to weigh to be considered light really light? Along with 29″ wheels came slightly heavier weight weenie builds, but at this point I think it’s safe to say that anything under 16 pounds would be considered really light. Especially if it has pedals. That makes r2bike’s Opencycle 1.0 build impressive at just 15.2 lbs/6.9kg with pedals.

To get the weight down the company enlisted the help of some fairly exotic parts – get the build after the jump…

r2bike Open cycle 1 0 15 pound 29 mountain bike (6)

r2bike Open cycle 1 0 15 pound 29 mountain bike (7) r2bike Open cycle 1 0 15 pound 29 mountain bike (4)

Starting with an Opencycle 1.0 frame, the front end of the bike was completed with a 3T Rigid Team Stealth fork. Cockpit choices include an MCFK stem, bar, seatpost and saddle, with stopping provided by Formula R1 Racing brakes and Ashima rotors. An interesting choice for the drivetrain includes a SRAM XX 2×10 system, instead of the ubiquitous 1x setups. However, that choice may be based around the Clavicula M3 crank complete with an SRM powermeter.

r2bike Open cycle 1 0 15 pound 29 mountain bike (2)

r2bike Open cycle 1 0 15 pound 29 mountain bike (3) r2bike Open cycle 1 0 15 pound 29 mountain bike (5)

To get the 29″ wheels as light as possible they were built with Tune Prince/Princess hubs laced to AX Lightness clincher rims running Schwalbe Thunder Burt Tires. The bike is shown with Bebop stainless pedals. Total weight comes in right at 6.9 kg, or 15.2 pounds.





Sevo - 08/06/14 - 11:32am

15.2lbs WITH an SRM Powermeter


goridebikes - 08/06/14 - 11:37am

So 1x and no power meter for sub 15lb… legit.

bsavery - 08/06/14 - 11:58am

So…. What’s the point of a power meter with no head unit?

CXisfun - 08/06/14 - 12:31pm

I was coming to post some snarky comment, but 6900g WITH and SRM, pedals, and 2×10 is serious. Holy cow.

Greg - 08/06/14 - 12:35pm


Dude - 08/06/14 - 12:49pm

This is very light, but a rigid fork is not going to work for 99% of mountain bikers.

Turbo - 08/06/14 - 3:32pm

Sorry that is not a mountain bike. That is a confused “fitness bike”.

Speshy - 08/06/14 - 3:59pm

I wish I could exercise on a bike like that!

Robbie Mubbledutt - 08/06/14 - 5:07pm

Yeah. None of those parts really shout “trail worthy.”

scentofreason - 08/06/14 - 5:09pm

not a ‘real mountain bike’ without a dropper post… sorry open, better luck next time…

Pete - 08/06/14 - 5:10pm

Big deal. I could get my SJ Expert carbon down to mid-15’s with a rigid Chisel fork and gravel grinder tires… No exotic parts needed.

PS No mention of the cost of this rig

Ethan - 08/06/14 - 6:40pm

That bike has “enduro” written all over it.

Dougie Dolphin - 08/06/14 - 7:00pm

Quick question: am I right in assuming Mcfk is supposed to be pronounced like “McF*ck”?

srm valet - 08/06/14 - 7:27pm

@bsavery You pay a guy to run alongside you with the head unit and read your wattage out loud.

WannaBeSTi - 08/07/14 - 12:51pm

So you’re saying that all the XC racers and people that ride hardtails without a dropper post aren’t real mountain bikers?

If so, well, I guess I should throw away all my mountain bikes and mountain bike gear. So, what’s a “cool” road bike?

ccr - 08/07/14 - 11:57pm

I’ma back flip it!! I’ma back flip itttt!

No for real…. Put slicks on it and commute, cuz ain’t no body taking that to the mountain.

Better yet…Cross race it

JC - 08/08/14 - 8:16am

Hey, a Bike without suspension and dropper seatpost is not a MTB…..? Really?
Did you ever rode a 29″full rigid with the right geometry and the right specs?
It’s a true MTB man, and more than 90% of the sh*t that many companies are try to sell.
It’s even a Big Mx man, the essence of the MTB….. Driving abilities and rider skills are more important than sh..y technology. But you think what you want to think and do what you wan to do……. Fashion and trend victims… ๐Ÿ˜‰

DT - 08/08/14 - 11:42am

Didn’t mountain biking start out in the 70’s on full rigid bicycles? Sounds like most of you can’t control a bike well enough to shred that thing through some trails. “I need FSR wah wah wah.” (deleted). I would change a few things on that bike, but over all it’s pretty sick IMO.

WannaBeSTi - 08/08/14 - 1:07pm

@JC and DT
My thoughts exactly…
I rode the XC trails last night. Caught a group of “Brah-Boys” on the climb and dropped them and their dropper posts on the descent. Man, I love that ’99 Steel Ibis…narrow bars, arch supremes, 1.95 tires…

Steve-O - 08/08/14 - 6:37pm

Thats so #enduro

JC - 08/09/14 - 12:04pm

@ WannaBesti

I’m not as xtrem than you ๐Ÿ˜‰
I ride a full rigid, yes, but with 35mm wide rims, 2.25 29″ tires, hydraulic disc brakes, rigid fork with 20mm thru axle, singlespeed……. My tough is the following, everybody think and do what they want (in the allowed limits ๐Ÿ˜‰ but personnaly I think that to ride a full rigid with the right geometry and the right setting is a lot of fun….. I like to ride full suspension braaaaap bikes to, but the “Caterham style” is the best for me.

JC - 08/09/14 - 12:05pm

Sorry….. Braaaap bikes too and not to !

Post a comment:

Comment sections can be a beautiful source of knowledge, conversation and comedy. They can also get pretty ugly, which is why we've updated our Comments Policy. If your comment isn't showing up or suddenly disappears, you might want to check it out.