Project 24.2 Initial Review: Ritchey WCS Carbon Matrix C260 stem

See all of our Project 24.2 posts here!

For the most part, it’s hard to get too excited about stems.  If they do their job well (and most do), they’re essentially unnoticeable.  Of course, if they don’t they’re ugly, flexy, or (if they do their job especially poorly) fail catastrophically.  That said, when we posted early word of Ritchey’s new C260 line of stems this fall, people got pretty excited.

Owing to its 260 degree clamp and gently curved 3-bolt steerer clamp, Ritchey’s WCS C260 stem tests 3-4x stronger in its aluminum form than any previous Ritchey stem- while being 30% stiffer than the preceding 4Axis design.  Throw a unidirectional carbon wrap over the same basic design and weight goes up by ~15g (to an actual 110g in our 90mm size) and stiffness by an additional 16%.  Oh, and it’s prettier, too.  After a couple of months on my Project 1.1 single speed and Project 24.2 race bike, has the C260 lived up to its light/strong/sexy billing?  Hit the jump to find out…

Ritchey’s 260 degree clamp is designed to hold 31.8 bars as firmly as possible- emulating a single bolt stem- while allowing easy stem changes.  The clamp’s opening is smaller than the diameter of the handlebar’s stem clamping area- but large enough to clear the smaller diameter that makes up the majority of mountain and road bars.  After removing the clamp face, installing a bar (even with controls attached) is easy- just slip a small diameter bar section through the clamp and slide the bar back to center.

The four rear-facing 3mm head (M4 thread) Allen bolts serve as a reminder to take it easy on the fasteners and, with a ratcheting torque wrench or Prestacycle’s tiny Prestaratchet, snugging the little bolts up is easy enough.  The three steerer clamp bolts are similarly tiny, arrayed along a carbon-friendly arc, are straightforward as well.  As with all lightweight components, using a properly set torque wrench to tighten both the steerer and bar bolts is critical.

Though some might scoff at the WCS Carbon Matrix stem’s carbon-over-aluminum construction, the simple fact is that few full-carbon stems are competitive when it comes to weight- and none yet make sense from a cost standpoint. By wrapping carbon fiber over a 7050 aluminum 3D forging, Ritchey has been able to produce a stem that is CEN approved, has carbon fiber’s sex appeal, and (at $160) costs 30-50% less than many full carbon options.  Sounds like a win to me.

Though I’m not a big guy, I like to think that I can put down a decent amount of power when needed.  And no bike draws from my deep well of inner rage like a singlespeed mountain bike.  Muscling an over-geared 29er up steep hills calls on everything I’ve got- and was never been enough to make the WCS Carbon Matrix C260 flex or otherwise complain one bit.  Since transplanted to our Project 24.2 race bike, the Carbon Matrix C260 is in keeping with our lightweight enduro bike build and should be just as home on Porcupine Rim as the racecourse.

Given that the aluminum WCS C260 stem is already significantly stiffer than earlier Ritchey stems, the best case for spending the extra $50 that the WCS Carbon Matrix C260 stem would be for big/powerful riders or anyone building a singlespeed or track bike.  On our Project 24.2 bike, which is more of an enduro bike as it is an outright race bike, the extra stiffness (and presumably strength) is more than welcome.  Besides, it matches the WCS Carbon Low Rizer’s unidirectional carbon finish and, when the sun catches it, is one sexy stem…

marc

ritcheylogic.com

Comments

tyler - 02/02/12 - 9:47am

what brand of spacers are you using? have a link to them?
thanks

Mallory - 02/02/12 - 11:12am

@tyler. There is nothing special about those spacers…pretty generic stuff…There are a couple Texalium (aluminum coated fiberglass) spacers in the stack…I suspect those are tho ones that are catching your attention(?)…again, pretty generic…companies such as Token offer them in a bunch of colors

tyler - 02/02/12 - 12:00pm

i have this ritchey stem but its narrower than the spacers i have… it looks a little off so was hoping to find spacers with the same outside diameter as the stem. clearly i’m being a little OCD but hey, a stem that sexy needs matching spacers…

Huh - 02/02/12 - 5:07pm

What is the stack height of the stem ? I don’t see it listed on the Ritchey site…

Also, can you actually FEEL a 14% stiffer carbon wrapped stem versus the alloy stem ???

Mic - 02/02/12 - 8:50pm

So I need to take off my lever when I want to change the stem?

tim o - 02/02/12 - 8:59pm

@Mic:

First read, *then* ask: “The clamp’s opening is smaller than the diameter of the handlebar’s stem clamping area- but large enough to clear the smaller diameter that makes up the majority of mountain and road bars. After removing the clamp face, installing a bar (even with controls attached) is easy…”

zzyzx - 02/03/12 - 11:22am

why is the carbon stem so much stronger than all itz previous alloy stem?

i wonder is it because of all previous Ritchey stem being weak?

Marc - 02/03/12 - 11:29am

Tyler,
Sorry- not sure where the spacers came from… they just sort of accumulate. The pink ones came from eBay, though.

Huh,
The stem measures 43mm at the steerer- a bit tall- but that’s by no means a bad thing if you’ve got the real estate. As far as the feel of a stiffer stem- the WCS is definitely stiffer than others in its weight class. I really noticed it on the single speed- but at 140lb, I’m not a huge guy. With tapered steerers on and off road, though, everything is stiffening up, which makes the flexy points more and more apparent.

marc

Post a comment:

Comment sections can be a beautiful source of knowledge, conversation and comedy. They can also get pretty ugly, which is why we've updated our Comments Policy. If your comment isn't showing up or suddenly disappears, you might want to check it out.